contact

All tips will be sent immediately to Scott Dyleski's defense team, headed by attorneys Katherine Hallinan and Sara Zalkin.  Please do not send tips to other websites about Scott as they are not officially endorsed by Scott's defense team nor family.


Case Evidence
Case Documents and Resources

 
Comment on Zuniga Denial of Habeas Petition October 2011

The Chilling Effect of the Gag Order

Reasonable Doubt and Other Suspects

The Politics of Fear and Demonizing Scott Dyleski

Daniel Horowitz's Bizarre Claims and Untruths
 


Scott Dyleski is a young man unjustly imprisoned in California for the murder of Pamela Vitale. Pamela Vitale was brutally murdered in her home in Lafayette, California on October 15, 2005. Scott was 16 at the time and lived in a planned community about a mile away in the same Hunsaker Canyon area of Lafayette.

Scott was sentenced to Life Without Parole in September of 2006. He was transferred to San Quentin Prison on his 18th birthday, becoming the youngest inmate in the California prison system at that time. Scott was later moved to Kern Valley State Prison.

Scott was convicted based on very flimsy evidence and lack of an adequate defense. He was assigned a relatively inexperienced Public Defender with limited resources who had to go up against an aggressive, experienced prosecutor with virtually unlimited resources in a case that received prejudicial coverage. However, his defense attorney did not even take advantage of the resources at her disposal nor question and follow-up testimony where she could have. At the least, both Scott Dyleski and Pamela Vitale deserve the justice of an intense investigation and a fair trial.







If you are poor and even if you can afford to pay your own lawyer, there is no way there is enough money to hire the private investigators, pay for independent forensic evidence testing, and hire experts to testify. The system is inequitable as the Prosecution has far more resources at their disposal. Particularly troubling is that a Public Defender typically also does not have as many resources as the Prosecution so there is no option except to raise funds for an adequate defense.


Inadequate Defense + Lack of Money = Injustice

Scott Dyleski



"The reality is that we provide criminal defense for poor people that is vastly inferior to what rich people can afford"

Quote from Norman Leestein in California Lawyer, May 2010. MR Public Defender: California's Only Elected PD is not afraid to speak his mind about oppressive caseloads. 





  ARTICLES - VIDEOS - OTHER CASES
'Convicting the Innocent: Aberration or Systemic Problem?', Rodney Uphoff, Wisconsin Law Review, 2006

'Prosecutorial Lawlessness is its Real Name', Hans Sherrer, Justice Denied Magazine, Vol 1(6)
California Reform Legislation (SB999)


The Tim Masters Case: It turns out that this 'evil' Goth kid who made macabre drawings wasn't so evil after all

What happens to immoral judges like Edward Dufresne who commit illegal acts? Apparently, nothing!

The West Memphis Three
WM3 and Satanic Panic

Ritual Murder of Woman by Satanic Goth 
* comments by Voltaire on 'What is Goth?'


Murder of Sophie Lancaster
* Hate Crime: killed because she was Goth










Reasonable Doubt and Other Suspects

Articles:
DNA Evidence -  Reasonable Doubt That Other Suspects are Involved by Kathryn Dixon (link)
Zealous defense will peck at Horowitz's actions after wife's death by Jonna M. Spilbor (link)

If Daniel Horowitz had been treated as a suspect, we would have either had his lawyer giving him an alibi for the morning Vitale was murdered or we would have had his lawyer claiming confidentiality. That seems just a little too coincidental or a little too disturbing. "His lawyer, Robert Massi, said he met Horowitz for breakfast between 8 a.m. and 10 a.m. that day. When the two parted, Horowitz was on his way to meet a colleague, Ivan Golde, at their office to work on their defense of Susan Polk, Massi said." (ref)

Below is just a discussion of the possible suspects that could have been presented by Scott Dyleski's attorney, Ellen Leonida, to create reasonable doubt. She presented none. Just like she presented no experts testimony for the defense. This discussion is not to point the finger at someone for being Vitale's killer, but for the same purpose that should have been followed in Dyleski's trial.

Pamela Vitale could have been a revenge kill related to one of Daniel Horowitz's clients or she could have been a hired hit by someone.



1. Daniel Horowitz Clients and Associates


Pavlo Lazarenko


According to Valez-Mitchell, Daniel Horowitz received death threats from people connected to the Pavlo Lazarenko case (see also Organized Crime and Corruption Watch for info on Lazarenko). Pamela Vitale was extremely important to the successes in that case it appears and was possibly more of a threat to Lazarenko's enemies than Daniel Horowitz (also see November 18, 2005 Contra Costa Times article by Bruce Gerstman). Vitale's true database and research genius were never presented after her murder. She was integral to and indisposable in defending Lazarenko and could have had enenies herself due to this, even though Horowitz told one reporter that, " she would not have made enemies of his clients or detractors (ref)."

Close in time to the murder, Horowitz had filed motions in the Lazarenko case.
Was this lead investigated? It appears both Horowitz could have held National Security Clearance to work on the Lazarenko case so the FBI would have been informed of her murder. Did Vitale know too much? Was that case at a point where she ws not needed anymore? Would this case have been impossible to prosecute if something and someone connected to the Lazarenko case were involved? If the answer to this questions is 'Yes', then would they have just let a murder in this rich neighborhood remain in limbo, remain unsolved? Some of Lazarenko's money was laundered through a bank in San Francisco.


In July 2013, Daniel Horowitz started a law office with two other attorneys, Laureen Bethards and Oksana Tsykova,  and a chiropractor from Stockton, Michael Yates.

Oksana Tsykova is the current wife of Pavlo/Pavel Lazarenko.
"Lazarenko's wife had returned to Ukraine, and his twin daughters appeared rarely, but his two aides and translators, both named Yuriy, one fat, the other skinny, were there. So was his son, Oleksandr, a thuggish-looking twentysomething with slick black hair who was often mistaken for a bodyguard. But no member of Lazarenko's posse drew more whispers than Oksana Tsykova, a blonde with striking Russian features and a growing belly who translated for Lazarenko at the defense table. A family friend of Lazarenko's who'd migrated from Ukraine to the Bay Area, she was in her third trimester when the trial began and gave birth days before the verdict (To Catch an Oligarch, Center for Investigative Reporting, 2004)."
Lazarenko was  tried and imprisoned in the US on money laundering (etc)  and is wanted for murder in the Ukraine.

"The U.S. Attorney Office has testimony in the case of former Ukrainian Prime Minister Pavlo Lazarenko that the murder of Ukrainian lawmaker Yevhen Scherban was paid for by Lazarenko and former prime minister and Batkivschyna Party leader Yulia Tymoshenko (Aug 12, 2010)

The PGO accuses Lazarenko of masterminding the murders of Hetman and Scherban in the criminal case investigated in Ukraine (Aug 3, 2011). "

It appears that Lazarenko still owns a LLC in the US and owns a house in Marin County.

Special Report: A little house of secrets on the Great Plains (Jun 28, 2011)

Court records submitted in Lazarenko's criminal case and documents from a separate civil lawsuit, as well as interviews with lawyers familiar with the matter, indicate Lazarenko controls a shelf company incorporated in Cheyenne [Wyoming] that owns an estimated $72 million in real estate in Ukraine through other companies.

The U.S. government continues to seek more than $250 million from bank accounts in Antigua, Barbuda, Guernsey and other countries that it says were controlled by Lazarenko and his associates, according to a forfeiture action filed by the Department of Justice.

The paper trail linking Lazarenko to the real estate in Ukraine is labyrinthine. At the heart of it is a shelf company called Capital Investments Group, registered at 2710 Thomes Avenue.
The lawsuit says Capital Investments was formed in September 2005...

But Capital Investments Group doesn't disclose the name of its owners. Daniel Horowitz and Martin Garbus, attorneys for the company, have represented Pavlo Lazarenko in other U.S. and Ukrainian litigation. They declined to provide the owners' names, citing client confidentiality, and wouldn't comment on Lazarenko's links to CIG.


Happy Valley Road Investors, LLC (Apr 6, 2010)

2010     0074187-01     04/15/2010     DEED OF TRUST/MORTGAGE     005           R                 HAPPY VALLEY ROAD INVRS LLC
                                          E                 HOROWITZ ALBERT
                                          E                 HOROWITZ MIRIAM


US embassy cables: Russian mafia boss linked to EU gas supplies, "Semyon Mogilevich, one of FBI's most wanted people, identified as real power behind billionaire owner of Ukrainian-based RUE .. "Lazarenko ordered the killings of Donetsk Governor Yevgen Scherban in 1996 and the head of Itera in Kyiv for not sharing Lazarenko's gas business philosophy." (Dec 1, 2010)

The Vitale Killing and the Possible Eurasian Connection, (Oct 17, 2005)
"The San Francisco area is home to a large community of immigrants from the former Soviet Union (FSU) region. In 2004, the California Department of Justice focused on two groups in its report on organized crime — Asian criminal gangs and criminal organizations from the FSU. Criminal organizations from the FSU generally are referred to as the Russian Mafia, although they include groups from Chechnya, Ukraine, Dagestan and other parts of the FSU. The California Justice Department classifies these groups under the general heading of Eurasian Organized Crime. Although criminal groups from the FSU are involved in a wide variety of criminal activity, the report cited money laundering and bank fraud as two areas in which Eurasian organized crime is expanding and becoming more sophisticated. Eurasian organized crime groups have a reputation for ruthlessness and violence. Killing someone in their own home is violent and personal — both characteristics of organized crime killings, especially those by some Eurasian groups."

According to media reports, Horowitz recently told his partner and lifelong friend Ivan Golde that he had reason to fear for his life. He had surveillance cameras installed on his property and kept a gun in his home for self-defense. Additionally, the couple’s home is reachable only by a single, long, winding road and protected by a locked gate operated by a keypad. Horowitz and Vitale, however, had been living in a trailer on their property while their new home was under construction, and had neutralized the security gate by posting the access code on it so that building contractors could easily enter. In addition, at least four other people lived on the property, increasing the number of people with access to and knowledge of the property’s layout.

Although she was a former high-tech marketing executive, Vitale had been working with Horowitz, building and maintaining databases for his practice. In the course of defending Lazarenko, Horowitz or Vitale could have gained access to sensitive information regarding his alleged criminal activity. If that is the case, some Eurasian organized crime element could have had Vitale killed either to keep the information from getting out, or as a warning to Horowitz.

Lazarenko, who likely will be released after his sentencing because he already has been under house arrest longer than the maximum sentence allowed for his conviction, has announced his intention to return to Ukraine and re-enter politics. The Vitale killing, then, also could have been a way for Lazarenko to tie up potentially damaging loose ends before returning home."

Capital Investments Group, Inc (Sept 09, 2005)
  • Director of CGI is Markus Mueller-Dombois 821 N El Dorado St., Stockton, CA 95202
  • Daniel Horowitz has a law office with Markus Dombois in Stockton, CA and represents CGI

Universal Trading & Investment Company v. Petro Mikolayevich Kiritchenko, et. al - ALEX LIVERANT, TORQ DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a California corporation, Defendant joins suit (Oct 14, 2005)


Information on the homicide of people’s deputy of Ukraine Y.Shcherban and the financing of this crime



Murder of Janet Daher in Lafayette, CA

At the time she was murdered, Horowitz was representing a young man who had committed a murder in Lafayette in 1998 with two other men. His client, Maury O'Brien fingered the other two suspects. Law enforcement was well aware of this case at the time based on comments in the news, but there is no evidence any individuals connected to Horowitz's cases were investigated.

2005: Vitale's death marked the first slaying in Lafayette since March 1998, when 46-year-old Janet Daher was found stabbed and strangled in her home. Three men were convicted in her killing. "This is very unusual for us," Fisher said, "a funny co-incidence, it seems that Horowitz defended one of the accused in the other murder 7 years ago. Coincidentally, Lafayette's last homicide seven years ago is now one of Horowitz's cases.

"After O’Brien and appellant used some cocaine in the restroom, they exited BART by jumping the turnstiles, and began walking toward the hills on the main road. O’Brien was wearing a black leather jacket, black pants, a black T-shirt and a black knit cap ... All three put on gloves, and O’Brien put a bandana over his face. O’Brien was carrying a “very large knife and two smaller knives.” ... Perez then told O’Brien to hand him a knife to “finish the job.” O’Brien handed Perez a hunting knife, and Perez stabbed the victim repeatedly while O’Brien and appellant watched. At that point, there was no doubt the victim was dead. (ref). "


2007: "Perez, O'Brien and Lee Snyder entered Daher's home on Rose Lane through an open garage door. The men had come to Lafayette on
a BART train from San Francisco in search of a crime of opportunity, police said.

Authorities found Daher's body hog-tied with a telephone cord and covered with stab wounds. Police said the mother of two put up no struggle and had guided the suspects to jewelry hidden in the house before she was slain...

Today, prosecutor Paul Sequeira formally dropped a number of charges against O'Brien, including the special circumstance of murder in the commission of a robbery, which would have made him eligible for the death penalty, Horowitz said.(ref)."

In 2007, O'Brien pled guilty but got only a 25 year sentence. Another man involved, Jose Perez, received a Death Sentence and the third, Lee Snyder, received LWOP.




3. Claims of Death Threats by Daniel Horowitz and...

Ivan Golde, Daniel Horowitz's colleague also stated that Horowitz had received threats and that's why he carried a weapon. So what were these threats? Who made these threats? And, why did the property and home where they were living have such a lack of security?

Horowitz has also claimed there is bad blood with Douglas Schneider because Schneider is anti-semitic. However, this is far from the first claim of anti-semitism by Daniel Horowitz and various others - in the habeas petition, Rick Ortiz says Horowitz made a claim of anti-semitism to get a building permit.

Horowitz claimed a foe of Pavlo Lazarenko, Past Presidedent of the Ukraine Leonid Kuchma, made anti-semitic remarks on a tape that was never presented in court (2004). But why did Daniel Horowitz have access to those tapes?


The federal judge in the trial of a former Ukrainian prime minister, charged with laundering money he allegedly looted from his country, rejected defense efforts Wednesday to offer evidence that Ukraine's president had manipulated the case with the help of an unnamed U.S. official.

Lawyers for Pavel Lazarenko claimed that President Leonid Kuchma, who fired him as prime minister in 1997, orchestrated the U.S. prosecution of Lazarenko and withheld documents from the defense.

They said Kuchma's former bodyguard Mykola Melnychenko was prepared to testify about clandestine tape recordings he made in 2000 in which Kuchma purportedly plotted to fabricate evidence against Lazarenko and pressure the United States to prosecute him.

Defense lawyer Daniel Horowitz also declared in court that information was being fed to Kuchma by "a spy . . . at a high level of the U.S. government, " although neither he nor Melnychenko would identify the alleged spy to reporters afterward (Testimony on spying allegation disallowed, May 20, 2004).



And, are these racist comments against a Puerto Rican prosecutor in the case below?




Per Rick Ortiz, Horowitz claimed his family saw Puerto Ricans as not so worthy and was threatened with some mob connection.

Daniel Horowitz is not a man without enemies.






4. Horowitz/Vitale Problems with Neighbors in Hunsaker Canyon


Joseph Lynch

How was Joseph Lynch cleared so quickly? Law Enforcement officers apologized to and cleared Lynch less than two days after Vitale's body was found. Based on what evidence was Lynch cleared? The blonde hair on Vitale's didn't match, but it didn't match Dyleski either and apparently wasn't even pursued.  Lynch had no alibi, he even said he was home with his dog at his RV all day. That RV is on Horowitz's property, the property next to the trailer and mansion.

In 2004, Lynch had sold his properly abruptly to Horowitz and Vitale , about a year before her murder with them agreeing he could live on the property in his RV for 10 years (till 2014). Horowitz and Vitale purchased the property for around $350, 000 it appears and Horowitz listed the property for sale around 2009 for ~$1,000,000 (link).

In the Spring of 2005, Lynch reported to police that Horowitz had threatened him twice with bodily harm or worse.


Daniel Horowitz had arranged Lynch's participation in the V.A. drug and alcohol rehabilitation program at some poin - after weeks of violent and dangerous behavior by Lynch in Hunsaker Canyon it was said. That program was too far away for Lynch to really attend, surely Horowitz knew this?


Horowitz filed a Restraining Order against neighbor Joseph Lynch shortly before Pamela Vitale was murdered claiming that Joseph Lynch might hurt his wife - filed 4 months, to the day, before she was murdered (Summer 2005, shown below). No one showed for court and Joseph Lynch never knew there was a restraining order.

In addition, it is rumored that Lynch had been served a 3-day eviction notice, meaning this occured just a day or two before the murder (ref). It is not clear whether Lynch was given that notice by Vitale or Horowitz or on what grounds.

Horowitz also claimed in interviews that Lynch was to pick up a check for the water delivered the day of the murder
when Pamela Vitale would be alone on the property (although it appears Lynch did not go to their home that day and that pertains to a water bill that Lynch oversees). Lynch clearly stated he did not see Vitale the day of the murder nor did Lynch really ever see Vitale much.


Case MSN05-0778 - Complaints/Parties (ref)
CIVIL HARRASSMENT

Select
Party Name
Type
Case Name
Category
Case Number
Filed
HOROWITZ, DANIEL   PETITIONER  DANIEL HOROWITZ & PAMELA VITALE VS. JOSEPH LYNCH  CIVIL HARASSMENT  MSN05-0778  06/15/2005 
  06/23/2005 1:35 PM DEPT. 59  HEARING ON OSC/TRO RE: HARASSMENT (CIVIL) FILED BY DANIEL HOROWITZ & P VITALE   DROPPED BY COURT   
  06/23/2005 1:30 PM DEPT. 59  HEARING ON OSC/TRO RE: HARASSMENT (CIVIL) FILED BY DANIEL HOROWITZ & P VITALE   NOT HEARD/CONT   


10/17/2005   COPIES x 10  Not Applicable   


Doug and Karen Schneider: Mr. Horowitz appears to have problems with other neighbors as a threat also, namely, the Schneiders in Hunsaker Canyon who he also filed a restraining order against years ago (see court record).

There is a legal record of Horowitz filing a similar claim over a decade earlier on the Schneider's - they have lived next door to him in Hunsaker Canyon. Horowitz claimed he thought Doug Schneider might hurt his wife, same as with the RO claim against Joe Lynch. Only then, it was a different wife, Leslie Coffin. Ironically, even though the Schneider's and Horowitz had been through a back-and-forth legal battle over land issues, Karen Schneider testified in Dyleski's trial that she didn't really know Horowitz. Why would she claim this?

Did anyone involved in Scott Dyleski's case, prosecution or defense, go back and check these records? The witness, Karen Schneider, seems to have lied about knowing Daniel Horowitz.





Case MS308882 - Complaints/Parties (ref)
PERSONAL HARASSMENT


Complaint Number: 1
Complaint Type: COMPLAINT
Filing Date: 11/25/1987
Complaint Status: ACTIVE
Party Number Party Type Party Name Attorney Party Status
PLAINTIFF  DANIEL A. HOROWITZ   Pro Per   
DEFENDANT  DOUGLAS SCHNEIDER   JACKL & KATZEN  Serve Required (WaitS) 


Case MS308882 - Actions

Viewed
Date
Action Text
Disposition
Image
  01/17/2007  COPIES   Not Applicable   
  12/28/2006  COPIES   Not Applicable   
  02/01/1996  ** FILE ENTERED ON MICROFILM ON 2-1-96      
 


Case MSC88-01182 - Complaints/Parties
PROPERTY DISPUTE


HOROWITZ, DANIEL A.  DEFENDANT  DOUGLAS & KAREN SCHNEIDER VS DANIEL & LESLIE HOROWITZ, CAROL ALTNEU (SISTER)
OTHER REAL PROPERTY/QUIET TITLE  MSC88-01182  03/24/1988

Complaint Number: 1
Complaint Type: COMPLAINT
Filing Date: 03/24/1988
Complaint Status: ACTIVE
Party Number Party Type Party Name Attorney Party Status
PLAINTIFF  DOUGLAS SCHNEIDER   SCHURICHT, DAVID A.   
PLAINTIFF  KAREN SUE SCHNEIDER   SCHURICHT, DAVID A.   
DEFENDANT  CAROL ALTNEU   KAHN, TERRY J.  Serve Required (WaitS) 
DEFENDANT  LESLEY COFFIN HOROWITZ   HOROWITZ, DANIEL A.  Serve Required (WaitS) 
DEFENDANT  DANIEL A. HOROWITZ   HOROWITZ, DANIEL A.  Serve Required (WaitS) 
DEFENDANT  ATTY - CAROL  HOROWITZ, DANIEL A.  Serve Required (WaitS) 
DEFENDANT  ATTY - DANIEL  KAHN, TERRY J.  Serve Required (WaitS) 
DEFENDANT  ATTY - LESLY  KAHN, TERRY J.  Serve Required (WaitS) 


HOROWITZ, DANIEL A.  PLAINTIFF  DANIEL A. HOROWITZ VS LESLEY A. COFFIN  PETN FOR DISSOLUTION  MSD93-01083  03/10/1993 

Doug Schneider is the person who called LE the day after Vitale was murdered claiming he thought Dyleski was connected to the murder, but falsely or erroneously claimed Dyleski had something shipped to Vitale's address. Karen Schneider had contacted police the day before Vitale was murdered about Credit Card fraud Dyleski said he was involved in.  She also contacted a neighbor, Partridge, about this the same day (the day BEFORE Vitale was murdered). Her two nephews knew because she called them to come stay with her that night - those nephews were still at the Schneider house very early Sunday morning the day after the murder when Det Barnes went to their  house, they said the Schneiders were not home at that time.  Does anyone wonder if she also called Horowitz or Vitale the day before the murder? Or if LE called them? Just 'coincidentally' LE claimed that Doug Schneider told them Dyleski intended to send an order to Vtiale's address, LE used this in their search warrant, but this was not true. What this obviously means is that Dyleski could have been chosen as a patsy before the murder took place or even the day of the murder.



5. Other Suspects

David Elder

A man, and meth addict, named David Elder had apparently told his girlfriend who lived in Hunsaker Canyon that he killed Pamela Vitale, bludgeoning her with his skateboard.
David Elder appears to have a history of arrests and violent tendencies. This was reported to law enforcement (see letter below and habeas petition) and the girls' mother went to Kim Curiel (a witness in the case) with the information. It appears responses to this information was "We already have a suspect." There is no evidence that this was investigated or that David Elder was even considered prior to Scott's conviction and for several years after until it was raised with Scott Dyleski's current attorneys. (reference: Habeas petition and Exhibits).

Letter about David Elder, 2009
suspect david elder
                                            lafayette murder pamela
                                            vitale meth addict
                                            confession
suspect david elder
                                          lafayette murder pamela vitale
                                          meth addict confession













Gerald 'Gerry" Wheeler
There was fairly damning evidence at Wheeler's residence, a cabin on the Horowitz property. The jury did not hear this evidence. No discussion of Jerry Wheeler took place at Scott Dyleski's trial although scent dogs tracked to his home, adjacent to the Vitale/Horowitz main property. A cadaver dog alerted outside his bathroom and inside clothes were found soaking in a plastic box in OxyClean.  The water was red tinted.


Jerry said the blood on his mirror was his own and, oddly, there was a picture in his bathroom sink that had Pamela Vitale in it. Jerry initally failed a truth telling test given by police investigators. It appears he was never eliminated as a suspect, but merely dropped after Scott Dyleski was arrested. Jerry was a sometime methamphetamine user and worker on the Vitale/Horowitz mansion, however his name was not raised in court.

Although the dog tracking evidence was excluded, it could have helped Dyleski. Furthermore, one has to wonder how thoroughly that was used to explore possible evidence left by the killer. Here is just on exerpt from the Motion to Exclude referring to the dogs tracking to an abandoned mobile home - away from any path towards Dyleski's residence.


Exerpt of Dog Tracking
                                            Evidence excluded from Scott
                                            Dyleski's trial



6. Vitale/Horowitz Problems with Construction Contractors



Rick Ortiz
Mr. Ortiz was the main/original builder on the Vitale/Horowitz mansion. (reference: Habeas petition and Exhibits).
He was never interviewed by police investigators, the prosecutor, or by either of Scott Dyleski's attornies (Ellen Leonida and Philip Brooks). Mr. Ortiz came forward in April of 2011.  Mr. Ortiz says he was threatened  by Mr. Horowitz, actually that Horowitz could not protect him from what his family would do to him because of construction problems and that Mr. Horowitz changed documents that eventually gained him Ortiz's entire property only months before Vitale was murdered.



Tehama County, CA Public Records



08/02/2004
DEED OF TRUST


Document Number    Z0465786
Instrument_Number    013672
InstrumentType    SUBSTITUTION OF TRUSTEE
Recording_Date    06/20/2005
Grantor    HOROWITZ, DANIEL
NORTH AMERICAN TITLE CO
ORTIZ, RICK S
ORTIZ, TONI L
VITALE, PAMELA
Grantee    HOROWITZ, DANIEL
VITALE, PAMELA
Book    2731
Page    0068


08/02/2004
ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS

Document Number    Z0512325
Instrument_Number    015724
InstrumentType    ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS
Recording_Date    08/02/2004
Grantor    ORTIZ, RICK S ORTIZ, TONI L
Grantee    HOROWITZ, DANIEL
VITALE, PAMELA
Book    2540
Page    0452


06/20/2005
SUBSTITUTION OF TRUSTEE

Document Number    Z0465786
Instrument_Number    013672
InstrumentType    SUBSTITUTION OF TRUSTEE
Recording_Date    06/20/2005
Grantor    HOROWITZ, DANIEL
NORTH AMERICAN TITLE CO
ORTIZ, RICK S
ORTIZ, TONI L
VITALE, PAMELA
Grantee    HOROWITZ, DANIEL VITALE, PAMELA
Book    2731
Page    0068


06/20/2005  RECONVEYANCE

Document Number    Z0465782
Instrument_Number    013672
InstrumentType    RECONVEYANCE
Recording_Date    06/20/2005
Grantor    BK 2540 O R PG 452
Grantee    ORTIZ, RICK S
ORTIZ, TONI L
Book    2731
Page    0068


06/20/2005
DEED OF TRUST


Document Number    Z0465845
Instrument_Number    013675
InstrumentType    DEED OF TRUST
Recording_Date    06/20/2005
Grantor    SANTIAGO, JOSE
Grantee    HOROWITZ, DANIEL VITALE, PAMELA
Book    2731
Page    0078


06/20/2005
ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS


Document Number    Z0465840
Instrument_Number    013675
InstrumentType    ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS
Recording_Date    06/20/2005
Grantor    SANTIAGO, JOSE
Grantee    HOROWITZ, DANIEL VITALE, PAMELA
Book    2731
Page    0078



Numerous Construction Contractors

Horowitz announced his mansion was completed the day he testified in court in the Scott Dyleski case, the Summer of 2006. Yet, lawsuits against construction contrators are numerous and have yet to be settled.


04/13/2012 9:05 AM DEPT. 19      JURY TRIAL - LONG CAUSE/ 15 DAY(S)              
03/21/2012 9:30 AM DEPT. 19      ISSUE CONFERENCE             
07/15/2011 9:05 AM DEPT. 19      JURY TRIAL - LONG CAUSE/ 15 DAY(S)  



Case MSC08-01349 - Complaints/Parties

Complaint Number:     1
Complaint Type:     COMPLAINT
Filing Date:     05/23/2008
Complaint Status:     ACTIVE


PLAINTIFF      DANIEL HOROWITZ            
ATTORNEY
      DANIEL J  RUSSO     

         Party Type         Party Name            Attorney          Party Status
2      DEFENDANT      TIM VAN SANDT       RIDDLE, JOHN E      Answer 07/21/2008
3      DEFENDANT      A K PLASTERING      RIDDLE, JOHN E      Answer 07/21/2008
5      DEFENDANT      FERNANDO SOLIS             PARTY REMOVED 10/28/2008
6      DEFENDANT      SOLIS MASONRY            PARTY REMOVED 10/28/2008
7      DEFENDANT      FERNANDO SOLIS, DBA SOLIS MASONRY      LEE, MARK S.      Answer 10/28/2008
9      DEFENDANT      MARVIN WINDOWS, INC.      FICENEC, JAMES J      Answer 02/13/2009
 

Complaint Number:     2
Complaint Type:     CROSS COMPLAINT
Filing Date:     07/21/2008
Complaint Status:     ACTIVE
Party Number     Party Type     Party Name     Attorney     Party Status
2      CROSS COMPLAINANT      TIM VAN SANDT       RIDDLE, JOHN E      First Paper Fee Paid
3      CROSS COMPLAINANT      A K PLASTERING      RIDDLE, JOHN E      First Paper Fee Paid
4      CROSS DEFENDANT      ROES 1-200            Serve Required (WaitS)
 
Complaint Number:     3
Complaint Type:     CROSS COMPLAINT
Filing Date:     10/28/2008
Complaint Status:     ACTIVE
Party Number     Party Type     Party Name     Attorney     Party Status
7      CROSS COMPLAINANT      FERNANDO SOLIS, DBA SOLIS MASONRY      LEE, MARK S.      First Paper Fee Paid
2      CROSS DEFENDANT      TIM VAN SANDT       RIDDLE, JOHN E      Answer 11/03/2008
3      CROSS DEFENDANT      A K PLASTERING      RIDDLE, JOHN E      Answer 11/03/2008
8      CROSS DEFENDANT      RICK ORTIZ             PARTY DISMISSED 11/09/2009
 
Complaint Number:     4
Complaint Type:     CROSS COMPLAINT
Filing Date:     03/01/2011
Complaint Status:     ACTIVE
Party Number     Party Type     Party Name     Attorney     Party Status
2      CROSS COMPLAINANT      TIM VAN SANDT       RIDDLE, JOHN E      First Paper Fee Paid
3      CROSS COMPLAINANT      A K PLASTERING      RIDDLE, JOHN E      First Paper Fee Paid
10      CROSS DEFENDANT      D.L.M. PLASTERING COMPANY, INC      MENEKSHE, AYHAN M      Answer 03/24/2011
             





Juan Perez


Case MSC05-01397 - Complaints/Parties (ref)
FRAUD


HOROWITZ, DANIEL   PLAINTIFF  HOROWITZ VS PEREZ  FRAUD  MSC05-01397  06/30/2005 
PLAINTIFF  DANIEL HOROWITZ   GOLDE, IVAN   DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 02/03/2006 
PLAINTIFF  PAMELA VITALE   GOLDE, IVAN   DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 02/03/2006
  10/17/2005  COPIES   Not Applicable   
  09/14/2005  (U.J.) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT OF DANIEL HOROWITZ FILED BY JUAN PEREZ (ALL SEASONS ROOFING)  Not Applicable  N/A




















  This site was made by a friend of Scott's
contact





all original content is copyrighted by ScottDyleski.org Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

artwork entitled, "Earth LIfe Sun", in the background is by Jean-Francois Colonna, Ecole Polytechnique, France